Skip to content

    Under active development. New calculators and features ship every week. Everything currently runs free while the site matures — pricing pages are a preview, checkout is not open yet.

    Calculates locally in your browser · lateral earth pressure and stability
    Geotechnical / retaining wall

    Retaining wall stability

    A cantilever wall fails in one of three ways: it tips over, it slides, or it pushes the soil past its bearing capacity. This computes the Rankine thrust from the soil, surcharge and water, then checks all three modes and reports the stem moment the reinforcement has to carry.

    Bearing126 kPaEccentricity0.29 mVerdictStable
    Active coefficient Ka
    0.333
    φ = 30°, Kp = 3.00
    Total horizontal thrust
    61.3 kN/m
    acting 1.48 m above the base
    Overturning
    FS 4.20
    needs 1.50 — satisfied
    Sliding
    FS 2.02
    needs 1.50 — satisfied
    Forces and stability checks
    Per metre of wall. The three horizontal drivers are separated because they behave differently.
    61 kN/m
    Forces and stability checks
    CheckValueNote
    Active coefficient Ka0.333Rankine, φ = 30°
    Passive coefficient Kp3.001 / Ka
    Coulomb Ka (δ = 20°)0.297Wall friction reduces the thrust further
    Soil thrust48.0 kN/mLever arm 1.48 m
    Surcharge thrust13.3 kN/m10.0 kPa over 4.0 m
    Water thrust0.0 kN/mDrained
    Total horizontal61.3 kN/mThe sum of the three
    Total vertical239.2 kN/mStem, base and heel soil
    Overturning moment90.7 kN·mAbout the toe
    Resisting moment380.7 kN·mAbout the toe
    FS overturning4.20≥ 1.50 for a gravity wall
    Passive resistance4.3 kN/mOften neglected for a buried toe
    FS sliding2.02≥ 1.50
    Eccentricity0.29 mWithin B/6 = 0.50 m
    Bearing, max126 kPaAllowable 200 kPa
    Bearing, min34 kPaNegative means uplift at the heel
    Stem moment at base90.7 kN·m/mFor the stem reinforcement design

    A drained wall is a different structure from a flooded one. If the water height is anything other than zero, a drain and a filter are usually cheaper than the extra concrete the water demands.

    Inspect the model
    Choose a quick result view, a scaled comparison, or the complete diagnostic set.
    Thrust against wall height
    The square of the height: doubling the retained height quadruples the force.
    Thrust against wall height0.00048.9897.96146.94195.93244.911.01.01.51.52.02.02.52.53.03.03.53.54.04.04.54.55.05.05.55.56.06.06.56.57.07.07.57.58.08.0kN/m
    Where the horizontal load comes from
    Soil, surcharge and water. Water is usually the largest single addition and the easiest to design out.
    Where the horizontal load comes from0.00011.3322.6633.9845.3156.6448.00SoilSoil13.33SurchargeSurcharge0.000WaterWaterkN/m
    Canonical equations
    The exact relationships implemented by this engine.

    Ka = (1 − sin φ)/(1 + sin φ) · Valid for a vertical wall with horizontal backfill.

    Pa = ½ Ka γ H² · Acts at H/3 above the base.

    FS = ΣMr / ΣMo · Moments taken about the toe.

    q = V/B (1 ± 6e/B) · Valid while e ≤ B/6; beyond that the heel lifts.

    engineering methodology

    A clear path from inputs to results.

    A cantilever retaining wall fails in one of three ways: it tips over, it slides, or it pushes the soil past its bearing capacity. This computes the lateral thrust from the retained soil, any surcharge and any water, then checks all three modes and reports the stem moment the reinforcement has to carry.

    Step-by-step methodWorked exampleAssumptions explained

    How to use

    1. Enter the retained height and the base width.
    2. Set the soil unit weight and the effective angle of internal friction.
    3. Add any uniform surcharge on the backfill.
    4. Set the water table height — zero for a drained wall.
    5. Read the coefficient, the thrust, and the three stability factors.

    The formula

    Ka=1−sin⁡φ1+sin⁡φ  ;  Pa=12KaγH2  ;  FSot=ΣMrΣMoK_a = \frac{1-\sin\varphi}{1+\sin\varphi} \;;\; P_a = \tfrac{1}{2}K_a\gamma H^2 \;;\; \mathrm{FS}_{\mathrm{ot}} = \frac{\Sigma M_r}{\Sigma M_o}

    Reference: Rankine earth pressure theory; stability factors and the bearing equation follow Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, and the usual 1.5 working-stress targets.

    Worked example

    4 m wall, 3 m base, φ = 30°, 10 kPa surcharge

    Inputs
    • Retained height 4 m, base width 3 m, drained.
    • Soil 18 kN/m³ with φ = 30°, 10 kPa surcharge.
    • Base friction 0.5, allowable bearing 200 kPa.
    • Stem 0.4 m thick at the base, base slab 0.4 m, concrete 24 kN/m³.
    Calculation path
    1. 1

      Ka = (1 − sin 30°)/(1 + sin 30°) = 0.333.

    2. 2

      Soil thrust is ½ × 0.333 × 18 × 4² = 48.0 kN/m, acting 1.33 m above the base.

    3. 3

      Surcharge thrust is 0.333 × 10 × 4 = 13.3 kN/m, acting at mid-height.

    4. 4

      Overturning moment about the toe is 48 × 1.33 + 13.3 × 2 = 90.7 kN·m.

    5. 5

      Resisting weight is 38.4 kN of stem, 28.8 kN of base and 149.0 kN of heel soil, plus 23 kN of surcharge on the heel.

    6. 6

      That gives 239.2 kN and a resisting moment of 380.7 kN·m, so overturning is 4.20 — comfortably above 1.5.

    7. 7

      Sliding is 239.2 × 0.5 / 61.3 = 2.02, also above 1.5.

    8. 8

      The resultant sits 0.29 m off centre, inside B/6 = 0.50 m, so the toe pressure is 126 kPa against an allowable 200 kPa.

    Result

    Ka 0.333 · thrust 61.3 kN/m · overturning 4.20 · sliding 2.02 · toe 126 kPa.

    Interpreting the result

    Overturning and bearing almost always pass on a sensibly proportioned wall; sliding is the one that catches people out, because the base friction coefficient is a soil property and not a design choice. Water is the other trap: raising the table to the top of the wall roughly doubles the thrust and adds a pore pressure that the soil weight no longer offsets.

    Assumptions & limitations

    • Rankine theory, which assumes a vertical wall, horizontal backfill and no wall friction. A Coulomb coefficient is shown alongside so the difference is visible.
    • The soil is homogeneous and drained above the water table; below it the effective unit weight is reduced by 9.81 kN/m³.
    • The stem is modelled as a rectangle of the base thickness rather than a taper, which is slightly conservative.
    • Passive resistance in front of the toe is computed but is often neglected in practice because the ground there may be excavated.
    • Seismic earth pressure, global slope stability and the structural design of the reinforcement are not modelled.
    • The wall is a cantilever on a spread base; piled and anchored walls need a different analysis.

    Frequently asked questions

    Why is Ka one third at φ = 30°?

    Because (1 − 0.5)/(1 + 0.5) = 0.333. It is a useful number to remember: at a friction angle of 30°, the soil pushes with a third of its vertical stress, and the passive resistance is three times it.

    Why does water matter so much?

    Because it adds 9.81 kN per cubic metre of height squared, on top of removing the buoyant weight of the soil it displaces. A metre of water at the base of a 4 m wall adds about 5 kN/m of thrust and 1.6 kN·m of moment — small — but at the full height it adds 78 kN/m and dominates everything.

    What is the difference between active and passive pressure?

    Active pressure is what the soil exerts when the wall moves away from it; passive is the resistance when the wall pushes into it. Passive is several times larger but requires much more movement to mobilise, which is why it is treated cautiously.

    What factor of safety should I use?

    1.5 against overturning and sliding is the usual working-stress target for a gravity or cantilever wall, and 2.0 for sliding where the friction coefficient is uncertain. LRFD designs use load and resistance factors instead, which give a different but comparable margin.

    Why is my sliding factor so low?

    Usually the base friction coefficient. A value of 0.5 is typical for silt and fine sand; 0.35 is realistic for clay. Adding a shear key or widening the base helps, and both are cheaper than increasing the wall thickness.

    Can I use this for a basement wall?

    The pressure calculation is the same, but a basement wall is restrained at the top by the floor diaphragm, which changes the structural model from cantilever to propped. Use this for the earth pressure and design the wall for the propped case separately.

    Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-21. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.