Duct Fitting Losses
The pressure loss through a duct fitting from its loss coefficient and the velocity pressure. Fittings often cost more pressure than the straight run, which is why a duct layout is decided at the elbows.
| Velocity (m/s) | Velocity pressure | Loss per fitting |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5.4 Pa | 1.6 Pa |
| 5 | 15.0 Pa | 4.5 Pa |
| 7 | 29.4 Pa | 8.8 Pa |
| 9 | 48.6 Pa | 14.6 Pa |
| 12 | 86.4 Pa | 25.9 Pa |
Pv = 0.5·ρ·V² · Dynamic pressure.
Δp = K·Pv · K from the fitting tables.
A clear path from inputs to results.
The pressure loss through a duct fitting from its loss coefficient and the velocity pressure. Fittings often cost more pressure than the straight run, which is why a duct layout is decided at the elbows.
How to use
- Set air velocity (m/s).
- Set loss coefficient k.
- Set number of fittings.
- Set air density (kg/m³).
- Read the headline metrics, then check the table for the detail.
The formula
Reference: Δp = K·0.5·ρ·V²; K from ASHRAE fitting tables.
Worked example
At the default inputs
- Air velocity (m/s): 6; Loss coefficient K: 0.3; Number of fittings: 8; Air density (kg/m³): 1.2
- 1
Velocity pressure: 21.6 Pa · Loss per fitting: 6.5 Pa · Total for the run: 52 Pa · Fan power: 0.05 kW
Velocity pressure: 21.6 Pa · Loss per fitting: 6.5 Pa · Total for the run: 52 Pa
Interpreting the result
At 6.0 m/s each fitting costs 6.5 Pa, so 8 of them cost 52 Pa.
Assumptions & limitations
- K is constant for the fitting geometry.
- No system effect from the fan outlet.
Frequently asked questions
Why do fittings dominate?
A single elbow can cost more than ten metres of straight duct.
Does velocity or size matter more?
Velocity, squared — which is why duct sizing drives fan power.
Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-22. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.